4 or more | 3yr avg | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
Cardinals | 8.3 | 7 | 10 | 8 |
Astros | 9.3 | 8 | 9 | 11 |
Cubs | 6.7 | 6 | 8 | 6 |
Reds | 11.3 | 13 | 11 | 10 |
Pirates | 9.3 | 9 | 9 | 10 |
Brewers | 8.7 | 10 | 8 | 8 |
AVG | 8.9 | |||
12 or more | 3yr avg | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
Cardinals | 5.7 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
Astros | 6.0 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
Cubs | 5.3 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
Reds | 4.7 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
Pirates | 6.0 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
Brewers | 5.0 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
AVG | 5.4 | |||
20 or more | 3yr avg | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
Cardinals | 3.0 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
Astros | 3.7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Cubs | 4.3 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
Reds | 2.3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Pirates | 3.3 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
Brewers | 3.3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
AVG | 3.3 | |||
30 or more | 3yr avg | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
Cardinals | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Astros | 1.7 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
Cubs | 2.7 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Reds | 1.0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Pirates | 1.7 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Brewers | 2.0 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
AVG | 1.8 | |||
Wins | 3yr avg | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
Cardinals | 91.7 | 85 | 97 | 93 |
Astros | 88.0 | 87 | 84 | 93 |
Cubs | 81.0 | 88 | 67 | 88 |
Reds | 71.0 | 69 | 78 | 66 |
Pirates | 69.7 | 75 | 72 | 62 |
Brewers | 64.0 | 68 | 56 | 68 |
All of these numbers are overdetermined. Some teams used a lot of starters because their first choices were awful. Others used a lot of starters because of injury. Furthermore, there's no strong correlation between the number of starters a team uses and the number of games a team wins. In 2002, the Cardinals won 97 games giving ten different pitchers at least four starts. The Brewers had a more stable rotation and won 56.
This is an era that's rough on pitchers. There are many reasons for this. One, more teams emphasize OBP, working the count, and getting to the bullpen as an offensive strategy. The number of pitches per game has gone up considerably over the last few decades. Two, the new ballparks, such as PNC, have less foul territory. This adds a few outs to every game. I could go on, and if anyone doubts the growing burden on pitchers these days, they should get into the work of Will Carroll, whose new book, Saving the Pitcher, will make a fuller case.
As a response to the increased burden on pitchers, many teams - like the Pirates - now carry twelve pitchers on the 25-man roster. Years ago, the norm was ten. (In case you hadn't made the connection, this is why the Pirates focus on stocking the bench with utility players such as Rob Mackowiak and Abraham Nunez.) The increased burden on pitchers is also reflected in the high number of starters used on more than a stopgap basis.
The five-man rotation is a myth. A team may start the season with five starters, and it's possible that those five starters will combine for 140 starts. In that case, there's always a need for a six and maybe a seventh to make up the rest of the starts. But it's also common for a team to give six or seven starters twelve or more starts, and ten starters four or more starts.
The Pirates should plan on using nine or ten starters this year. Let's say ten to be cautious. This way they are prepared for the worst. Should we lose a starter or two to trade, injury, or miserably failing performance, the Pirates have someone ready to go. In all likelihood, four of the ten will only be needed for four to eleven starts. The best thing to do now, at the final preseason roster cuts, is to look ahead and rank the starters in the order you'd like to use them. I think the current ranking must look something like this:
# of pro starts | 3yr AVG | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |
1 | Wells | 29 | 33 | 31 | 24 |
2 | Benson | 14 | 18 | 25 | 0 |
3 | Fogg | 25 | 26 | 33 | 16 |
4 | Vogelsong | 20 | 31 | 12 | 16 |
5 | Reed | 28 | 21 | 32 | 32 |
6 | Perez | 29 | 32 | 27 | 28 |
7 | Burnett | 26 | 27 | 26 | 26 |
8 | Van Benschoten | 21 | 26 | 27 | 9 |
9 | Meadows | 25 | 15 | 33 | 28 |
10 | Torres | 15 | 16 | 29 | 0 |
11 | Dave Williams | 18 | 28 | 9 | 16 |
12 | Cory Stewart | 16 | 24 | 23 | 0 |
Only Wells, Fogg, and Vogelsong look good for a likely 25 starts. Even if Benson is not traded, it wouldn't be wise to plan for him making more than 20 starts. This is not a rotation that looks like the 2003 Cubs.
Meadows and Torres, the swing men, can nail down the nine and ten spots. Oliver Perez and Dave Williams can jump into the rotation when they are throwing consistently well. Since they both look far from ready at the start of April, a safe estimate would be that one of these two will be ready for the rotation by the middle of the summer. They fill the eighth spot for now then. Van Benschoten and Burnett look good and ready, though they are young and have no experience above AA. Give them spots six and seven. Until Perez gets his act together, I'd rather turn to these two when we need new starters.
Even if we don't trade Benson next week, Reed now has to hold the fifth spot or we are planning to use the guys at the back end of the list. Cory Stewart might be ready; he did well enough at AA last year. Maholm shouldn't be in this year's plans. We've seen enough to Meadows and Torres to know they aren't members of the next Pirate rotation to lead the team to the playoffs. With the youth of the pitching staff, the Pirates should want Meadows and Torres in long relief since there will be plenty of games in which the young starters roll up high pitch counts and the longmen are called in to start the fourth or fifth or sixth inning.
Reed stabilizes the rotation at least for now. If he can pitch well enough to be a fifth starter, it makes sense to keep him. Even average starting pitchers are hard to get on the free agent market and command a large price. If the Bucs cut Reed before they give him a few more starts to prove he can still contribute, then they are basically shifting some of the burden to the back end of this long rotation. I don't know that I want it there any more than I want it on Reed. The rotation is young enough; the youth of Williams, Stewart, and Maholm is not reason enough to bring them to the big club, especially if they haven't shown they can dominate at a lower level. It makes sense to keep Reed for now.
... 5:00 update. It doesn't make any sense to keep him, of course, if he's finished, if he can't get the ball past the hitters, if we look under the hood and find a family of squirrels sleeping on the engine block. Line today: 2 IP, 5 hits, 2 walks, no Ks. That's squirrelly.
... April 3 update: The Pirates did the right thing and offered Reed a job in the minor leagues. Not sure he'll accept the assignment. If he can round into shape, he could be useful. In the meantime, refusing Reed the luxury of rounding into shape while a member of the 25-man roster sends the right message to the team and to the fans.
No comments:
Post a Comment