Them lazy umps

From the Post-Gazette's Q & A by Dejan Kovacevic:

Be very certain that the Pirates were shown no respect whatsoever by the crews at Yankee Stadium and Fenway Park last week.

Longtime readers know I am not one to write much about officiating. When I do, it is usually to dismiss such complaints. But what happened in New York and Boston, especially in New York, stuck out to the point that it raised some obvious questions. It would take a conspiratorial mind-set rivaling Oliver Stone's to imagine that umpires are favoring either New York or Boston, but I think there is abundant evidence that teams that are seen as being in contention get calls over those who are not.

These umpires, specifically, were so very clearly operating with a mindset that was influenced either by the large and vocal crowds in those stadiums or the reputations of the participating teams. There almost is no other way to explain missing the call at first on Wednesday or the possibly worse call at second on Friday.

Either is a poor excuse.

Even then, all of that was topped by the remarkably unprofessional behavior of umpire Tony Randazzo in New York. After blowing the call, he stood by first base and stared into the Pirates' dugout, then motioned with his hand for McClendon to shoo away. Then, the next night, after he allegedly was distraught by his error, he followed an unrelated argument with McClendon (this one had to with the Randy Johnson thing . . .) by turning toward the Pirates' dugout and making a safe call.

That is beyond belief.

And people wonder why we get so upset when the off-season publications lazily repeat the story that the Pirates are losers doomed to be losing forever. If you think it doesn't have an effect on the playing field, look no further.